S.RAVINDRA BHAT, A.K.CHAWLA
TANISHQ GANGWAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. In these writ proceedings, the Petitioners challenge the constitutional validity of the Regulations on Graduate Medical Education(Amendment), 2018 (“impugned amendment” hereafter) issued by notification dated 22.01.2018 by the Medical Council of India (“MCI” hereafter) with the previous approval of the Central Government (hereafter “UOI”) as far as it prescribes that candidates who have cleared Biology/Biotechnology as an additional subject at 10+2 level after completing 10+2 without Biology/Biotechnology as a subject.
2. The impugned Regulations debarred all candidates who have passed 10+2 level with Biology/Biotechnology as an additional subject whether simultaneously or subsequently at 10+2 level. The Regulations were challenged by some students before this Court by W.P.(C) No. 1917 of 2018. During the course of hearing, the MCI, without further amending the impugned Regulations issued a clarification that the impugned Regulations does not apply to students who have studied biology/biotechnology as an additional subject simultaneously with oth
Cellular Operators Association v Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (2016) 7 SCC 703
Christian Medical College Vellore & Ors v Union of India reported in (2014) 2 SCC 305
Dr. Preeti Srivastava Vs. State of M.P. - (1999) 7 SCC 120
Khoday Distilleries v State of Karnataka 1996 (10) SCC 304
Medical Council of India v State of Karnataka - (1998) 6 SCC 131
Raghukul Tilak v Union of India 2006 (92) DRJ 356
Raghukul Tilak v Union of India AIR 2007 Del 237
Shri Sitaram Sugar Mills Company v Union of India (1990) 3 SCC 223
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.