G.ROHINI, DEEPA SHARMA
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA – Respondent
G. ROHINI, J.
1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 19.12.2014 whereunder the learned Single Judge allowed W.P.(C) No.1842/2012 filed by the respondent herein and set aside the order dated 01.02.2012 passed by the Central Information Commissioner (CIC) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short ‘RTI Act’).
2. The facts in brief are as under:-
3. The appellant herein filed an application under the RTI Act with the Central Public Information Officer, Department of Justice, Government of India seeking the information relating to the details of the medical facilities availed by the individual judges and their family members of the Supreme Court in last three years including the information relating to expenses on private treatment in India or abroad. The CPIO, to whom the said application was transferred under Section 6(3) of the Act rejected the same by order dated 02.02.2011 on the ground that it is an exempted information under Section 8(1)(j) of the Act. The appeal preferred by the appellant herein was dismissed by the First Appellate Authority by order dated 07.03.2011. However, the further appeal to the CIC was allowed and by order dated 03.08.2011,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.