1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing and setting aside impugned orders dated 15.11.2017 and 13.09.2017. Consequently, declare the petitioner to be entitled to the benefit of judgments in Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors. vs. All India Young Lawyers Association (Registered) and another: (2009) 14 SCC 49 and P. Ramakrishnam Raju vs. Union of India & Ors. decided in Supreme Court in W.P.(C) 521/2002 and further direct the respondents to add ten years practice of the petitioner as an Advocate at Bar, towards qualifying service. Consequently, revised the Pension and Gratuity of the petitioner and arrears be calculated and disbursed to the petitioner by issuing of a revised PPO, including incorporation of Family Pension.

2. The brief facts of this case are that the petitioner is a Law Graduate and was enrolled as an Advocate with Bar Counsel of Delhi on 12.10.1984. The petitioner was appointed as Member (Judicial) in Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench on 12.10.2000. At the time of appointment, the petitioner was governed by CAT (Salaries and Allowances and Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 1985. The petitioner was t