SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Gulshan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.
1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and is directed against the impugned judgment dated 02.06.2016 and order on sentence dated 01.07.2016 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-03/North/Rohini Courts in FIR No. 356/2012, registered under Sections 365/392/394/307/186/364-A of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) at PS, Prashant Vihar whereby the Learned Sessions Judge has found the appellant guilty and has sentenced him as follows:
“It is not a rarest of the rare case inviting imposition of capital punishment. I therefore sentence the convict to undergo life imprisonment U/s 364-A IPC and pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-. He will undergo simple imprisonment for six months in case of default of payment of fine.
I further sentence the convict to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment U/s 392 IPC and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-. He will undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months in case of default of payment of fine.
I further sentence the convict to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment U/s 394 IPC and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-. He will undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months in cas
Raju@Balachandran & Ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Shafhi Mohammad V. The State of Himachal Pradesh
State of U.P. Vs. Jagdeo Singh
Sucha Singh v. State of Punjab
Bhagalool Lodh & Anr. Vs. State of U.P.
Dahari & Ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Ganga bhavani Vs. Rayapati Venkat Reddy & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.