SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 406

S.MURALIDHAR, I.S.MEHTA
Best Cybercity (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Salil Kapoor, Sumit Lal Chandani, Ananya Kapoor, Sidharth Kanwar, Zoheb Hossain, Piyush Goyal, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S. Muralidhar, J.

The Petitioner challenges a notice dated 29th March, 2018 issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3) (hereafter Assessing Officer, AO) under Section 147 read with Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to re-open the assessment for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-2012 as well as the order dated 26th October, 2018 rejecting the Petitioner's objections to the re-opening of the assessment.

Relevant facts

2. The Petitioner is a company engaged in real estate development and related services. It filed its return of income for the AY Sin question on 29th September, 2011 declaring a loss of Rs. 22,534/-. The return was picked up for scrutiny and a questionnaire dated 23rd October, 2012 was issued by the AO to the Petitioner inquiring about various aspects. Along with its reply dated 30th October, 2012 the Petitioner submitted all the relevant bank statements. A further reply was submitted on 6th November, 2012 stating that copies of the Audit Report, Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account (P & L Account) along with Schedule had already been placed on r

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top