PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Tata Chemicals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Puro Wellness Pvt Ltd. – Respondent
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
I.A. 10934/2018 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC)
1. The Plaintiff - TATA Chemicals Ltd. has filed the present suit for perpetual injunction, rendition of accounts and damages against the Defendant - Puro Wellness Pvt. Ltd. The Plaintiff is the manufacturer of TATA Salt. The Defendant manufactures Puro Healthy Salt.
Plaintiff's case
2. Tata Salt has been manufactured by the Plaintiff since 1983 and enjoys a market share of 24% - 25% in edible iodised salt. It claims to be a market leader in edible salt in India and was also the country’s first national branded iodised white salt.
3. Prior to the introduction of TATA Salt, non-iodised salt was being consumed in India and at that time, it was found that a large mass of the population suffered from ailments due to iodine deficiency. The Plaintiff thus commenced manufacture of iodine salt. It was the first iodine fortified salt manufactured and sold in bulk quantity to eliminate ailments relating to iodine deficiency. TATA Salt is promoted and advertised using catchphrases and slogans such as “Maine Desh ka Namak Khaya hai”, “Desh Ki Sehat, Desh Ka Namak”, etc.
4. It is claimed that the manufacture of TATA Salt is t
Abdul Gafur Vs. State of Uttarakhand
Bengal Waterproof Vs. Bombay Waterproof Manufacturing Company and Anr.
Colgate Palmolive Company and Ors. Vs. Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
Escorts Construction Equipment Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Action Construction Equipment Pvt. Ltd. and Another
Horlicks Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Heinz India (Pvt.) Limited
Indian Bank Vs. Maharashtra State Coop. Marketing Federation Ltd.
Procter & Gamble Home Products Private Limited Vs. Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.