SUNIL GAUR
Meera Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Statae, BCLT – Respondent
Sunil Gaur, J.
The above captioned first petition is directed against trial court's order of 15th November, 2016 vide which cognizance for the offence of cheating has been taken against petitioner-Meera Goel, whereas in the above captioned second petition, complainant-Priti Saraf is aggrieved by Revisional Court's order of 26th April, 2017, vide which trial court's order of 15th November, 2016 qua Ashok Kumar has been set aside.
2. Since both these petitions spring out of trial court's order of 15th November, 2016, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these petitions have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.
3. The facts giving rise to these petitions are that complainant-Priti Saraf had agreed to purchase 1205 sq. yards of land out of property No. 37, Friends Colony (East), New Delhi from petitioner-Meera Goyal for total consideration of Rupees Sixty Three Crores Twenty Eight Lacs Fifty Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty (Rs.63,28,50,750/-), out of which respondent Ashok Kumar, being Property Dealer, had received commission of Rupees Fifty Lacs (Rs.50,00,000/-) and petitioner-Meera Goyal had received the earnest money of R
Chandran Ratnaswami Vs. K.C. Alanisami
Enviro-Legal Action Vs. Union of India & Ors.
G. Sagar Suri Vs. State of U.P.
Indian Oil Corporation Vs. Neph India Ltd.
Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes Vs. Erasmo Jack de Sequeria
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat
R. Kalyani Vs. Janak C. Mehta & Ors.
Ramdev Food Product Private Limited Vs. State of Gujrat
State of Maharashtra Vs. Sayed Mohammed Masood & anr.
State of Orissa Vs. Saroj Kumar Sahoo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.