SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 949

SANJEEV NARULA
Louis Vuitton Malletier – Appellant
Versus
Iqbal Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pravin Anand, Adv., Udita Patro, Adv., Nischay Mall, Adv., Dhruv Anand, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Narula, J.

The present suit filed by the Plaintiff is for permanent injunction restraining infringement of its trademark, passing off, dilution, rendition of accounts of profits, damages and delivery up. The suit was originally filed as a regular suit and was registered as a commercial suit vide order dated 7th February 2018.

Proceedings in the suit.

2. On 2 nd December 2011, the summons in the suit were directed to be issued and also an ex-parte ad interim injunction was granted in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant. On service of summons, Defendants appeared and filed written statement on 30th September 2013 along with application seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement. The delay was condoned subject to cost. Thereafter, proceedings continued before the Joint Registrar. The admission/denial of the documents could not be completed. Nonetheless, when the matter was placed before the Court, issues were framed vide order dated 6th January 2014 to the following effect:-

"1. Whether the Plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the



































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top