SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1166

ANU MALHOTRA
Arvinder Kaur Sethi – Appellant
Versus
Dilkhush Industrial Estate Welfare Association (Reg. ) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
G.S. Raghav, Kamal Mehta, B.S. Tiwari, Sanchit Jain.

JUDGMENT :

ANU MALHOTRA, J.

Cav 220/2019

1. Learned counsel for the caveator is present and has been heard. The caveat thus, stands discharged.

CM (M) 376/2019

Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 21.01.2019 of the learned Trial Court of the Court of the ADJ-02 (North) Rohini Courts in CS (DJ) No. 59737/2016, vide which an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC filed on behalf of the defendant no. 6 to the said suit arrayed as the petitioner to the present petition was declined. Through the submissions that have been made on behalf of the petitioner and the respondent no. 1 i.e. the caveator i.e. the plaintiff of the said suit, it is brought forth as also through the impugned order that the contention sought to be raised on behalf of the petitioner herein was to the effect that the said suit i.e. CS (DJ) No. 59737/2016 was barred by law in terms of Order II Rule 2 of the CPC in as much as by institution of a suit bearing number CS (DJ) No. 57719/2016 bearing original No. 2212/2007 that had been filed by the plaintiff thereof i.e. the r































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top