SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1284

G.S.SISTANI, JYOTI SINGH
G. M. – Appellant
Versus
P. K. M. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sumit Kumar, Adv., Ranjan, Adv., Rabindra Nanda, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

G.S. Sistani, J.

C M APPL. 7817/2019

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 47/2019 & CM APPL. 7816/2019 (delay of 916 days)

3. The appellant/husband is aggrieved by the order dated 15.07.2016 passed by the Family Court on an application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as "HMA") seeking maintenance for herself and two minor school going children. The appeal is accompanied with an application seeking condonation of 916 days delay in filing the present appeal. The condonation of delay is sought on the ground that after passing of the impugned order, the appellant/husband had decided to challenge the same and asked his counsel appearing before the Family Court to proceed with filing the appeal. However, the counsel kept on providing false updates and only after two long years, the appellant/husband learnt that no appeal had been filed. Thereafter, the appellant/husband changed the counsel appearing before Family Court and appointed a new counsel and also started searching for a counsel in the High Court. Thereafter, he engaged the present counsel who











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top