SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1396

G.S.SISTANI, JYOTI SINGH
Jitender Rajpal – Appellant
Versus
Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sudhir Sharma, Adv., Rakesh Kumar, Adv., Chetan Dutt, Adv., Raj Kumar Yadav, Adv., Anubha Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

G.S. Sistani, J.

Cm.Appl 6658/2019 (Exemption) in FAO(OS) (COMM) 28/2019

CM.APPL 6660/2019 (Exemption) in FAO(OS) (COMM) 29/2019

CM.APPL 6664/2019 (Exemption) in FAO(OS) (COMM) 31/2019

Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The applications stand disposed of.

FAO(OS) (COMM) 28/2019 & CM. APPL6659/2019

FAO(OS) (COMM) 29/2019 & CM. APPL6661/2019

FAO(OS) (COMM) 31/2019 & CM. APPL6663/2019

3. These appeals have been filed by the appellants under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') against the impugned orders dated 17.12.2018 in (FAO(OS)(COMM) 28/2019 and FAO(OS)(COMM) 29/2019) and 21.12.2018 (FAO(OS)(COMM) 31/2019), whereby the learned Single Judges have dismissed the appellants' petitions under Section 34 of the Act challenging the impugned award dated 27.07.2018.

4. For the sake of convenience, we dispose of all these three appeals by a common order.

5. Since FAO(OS)(COMM) 28/2019 and FAO(OS)(COMM) 29/2019 are filed against the common impugned order of the learned Single Judge, the facts of FAO(OS)(COMM) 2




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top