KAILASH GAMBHIR
Shiv Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Hansita – Respondent
Kailash Gambhir, J.
By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the impugned Award dated 8.5.2002 passed in ID No. 417/1993 whereby the reference was answered by the learned Labour Court against the petitioner.
2. Brief facts as set out by the petitioner relevant for deciding the present petition are that the petitioner was appointed by the respondent as a machine man w.e.f. 1.11.1976 with the last drawn wages of Rs. 3200 per month, but was not given legal facilities and on demanding the same, the management got annoyed and terminated his services w.e.f. 18.06.1992. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner sent a legal notice dated 21.7.1992 to the respondent to which he received no reply. Thereafter, he raised an industrial dispute bearing ID No. 417/1993 whereby vide order dated 8.5.2002 the petitioner workman was held not entitled to any relief. Thereafter, the petitioner workman filed an application u/s 11 of the I.D Act r/w Section 114 & Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC for review of the above said award whereby vide order dated 21.4.2004 the said application was held to be not maintainable. Hence, aggrieved by the award
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.