PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, S.P.GARG
Virender Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
S.P. Garg, J.
1. Appellants in these four appeals are members of the same family who own different portions of property bearing No. 1822/1 and 1822/2 Chandni Chowk, Delhi 110006. All of them inducted State Bank of India as a tenant in the respective portion of the property owned by them.
2. Bhupendra Singh, the appellant in RFA(OS) 80/2011, had let out an area admeasuring 1820 sq.ft and 315.84 sq.ft. to the Bank. The last agreed rent with respect to the tenanted premises was Rs. 50,050/-per month. Said Appellant terminated the tenancy by a notice dated 12.8.1997 under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The termination took effect from 5.9.1997. Appellants, Virendra Singh, Pushpa Singh and Rajendra Singh, who have filed RFA(OS) No. 79/2011, 81/2011 and 82/2011 respectively, had each let out an area admeasuring 427 sq.ft. to the Bank. The last agreed rent with respect to each of the leased premises was Rs. 5,647/-per month. Said Appellants terminated the respective tenancy by separate notices dated 7.10.1997 issued under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The termination took effect from 15.11.1997.
3. Appellant, Bhupendra Singh filed Applications in Sept
Damadilal v. Parashram (1976) 4 SCC 855
Dimple Pvt. Ltd. v. Harsh Kaur Aggarwal Gian Devi Anand v. Jeevan Kumar 1985 (2) SCC 683
Jyoti Pershad v. U.T. of Delhi AIR 1961 SC 1602
Lal Chand (dead) by L.Rs. & Ors. v. Radha Kishan AIR 1977 SC 789
Shyam Kishore & Anr. V. Roop Saree Kendra 105 2003) DLT 422 : 2003 69 DRJ 544
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.