SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Del) 1031

VIPIN SANGHI
Kamal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. L.P. Dhir and Mr. Vikas Nautiyal, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. Baldev Malik, Advocate for the Respondent.

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)

1. This petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 28.11.1994 passed under section 7(1) and 7(3) of Smugglers And Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (SAFEMA), passed by the competent authority; the appellate tribunal order dated 08.03.1996 in FPA No. 4/DLI/95, and; the rectification order dated 08.05.1996 under section 20 of SAFEMA.

2. The petitioner, Piare Lal was served with a detention order dated 08.11.1976 issued in the name of Governor of Punjab, inter alia, stating that with a view to prevent him from dealing in smuggled goods, it is necessary that he be detained. A declaration was also issued by the Governor of Punjab under section 12A(2) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (`COFEPOSA') declaring that the detention is necessary, and that it is not in public interest to disclose the facts or to give an opportunity of making a representation to the detenu.

3. Following the said detention, which was unsuccessfully challenged by the petitioner, a notice dated 10.05.1978 was issued by the competent authority under secti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top