SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 1126

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
A.K.Sikri, Ajit Bharihoke, JJ.
Desh Raj Gupta - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
FAO (OS) No. 237 OF 2009 & CM No. 8309/2009
Decided On : 14-07-2010

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Anoop G. Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate and Mrs. June Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht and Ms. Aashita Yadav, Advocates for the Appellant.
Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikas Dhawan, Mr. Abhimanyu and Ms. Anita Lal, Advocates for the Respondent No. 2.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6.

Headnote:

Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 281 & 282 - Probate of registered Will - Dismissal of Probate Petition - Probate Petition verified by attesting witness - Onus to prove that testator was in sound disposition of mind was upon the propounder of the Will - Testator remained unwell during execution of Will with abnormal level of sodium called hyponatremia which causes lethargy, confusion etc. - Petitioner taking active part in execution of Will and not entering in witness box - Burden of proof not discharged - Impugned order, affirmed.

A.K. Sikri, J.

1. The genuineness and validity of purported Will dated 28.02.1985 got registered on 29.05.1985 of Lala Hansraj Gupta, Ex. Mayor of Delhi is the subject matter of the present appeal. After the death of Lala Hansraj Gupta (hereinafter referred to as `the testator') on 03.07.1985, the appellant (one of his sons) filed the probate case No. 62/1985 in October, 1985, propounding that Will. Some other legal heirs had challenged the veracity thereof. The learned Single Judge has returned his findings holding that the purported Will, in his opinion, is not a genuine Will which has resulted in the dismissal of the probate petition. Assailing that judgment, present appeal is preferred by the appellant.

2. The testator had a family consisting of wife, four married sons and two married daughters. Names of his children and few grand children are mentioned in the opening part of the Will. Family chart is as under:

"Family Chart

Lala Hans Raj Gupta (died on 3rd July, 1985)

Des Raj Shiv Raj Rajendra Mahendra Angira.

Gupta Gupta Kumar Gupta Kr. Gupta Gupta

....(Son)S1 (Son)s2 (Son)S3 (Son)S4 (Wife)

Ravi Raj ....Sanjay .....Arti Avanti Geeta Kirti

Uday Raj

...Jayant

(Grandson) ..(Grandson) ...(Grandson) ....(Grand-daughters)

Daughters of Lala Hans Raj

Pratibha Shashi

(Gopal, Sarita, (Karuna &

Amita,Nalini) Vikram)

Great Granddaughters (Amita,Sarita,Arti)"

3. The testator has given Rs. 15,000/- each of his grandsons and daughters and great grand children (children of his sons) and Rs. 5,000/- each to grand children of his daughters as a token remembrance. Main bequeath, insofar as interests are concerned, relates to his interest and share in M/s. H. G. Gupta and Sons as well as M/s. Mridul Enterprises Partnership, two partnership firms and his shares and other interest in M/s. Hansraj Gupta and Company Private Limited. He also had a share in two properties, viz., No. 20, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi and residential property, i.e., 3, Amrita Shergil Marg, New Delhi. As per this Will, his interest and shares in these properties devolved are as under:

"4. My interest and share in H.G. Gupta & Sons and M/s Mridul Enterprises Partnership and their respective goodwill be transferred to my grandsons Ravi Raj Gupta and Uday Gupta in the proportion of 3 to 1 and it is my fervent desire that this partnership may continue as a link between the family far as long as possible.

8. All my shares and other interests that I have in M/s. Hans Raj Gupta & Co. Pvt. Ltd. with that after my death the same may devolve on my son Shri Desh Raj Gupta and grandson Shri Ravi Raj Gupta equally. I wish that the said company be managed and controlled by my son Shri Ravi Raj Gupta as is being done today and none of my other legal heirs should raise any objection thereto.

10. That my share in property No. 20, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi and 3, Amrita Shergil Marg, New Delhi shall after my death devolve upon my 4 sons in equal shares."

One trust, viz., Hansraj Gupta Charity Trust was also created in respect of which Will provides as under:

"9. After clearing all the aforesaid liabilities the executors shall make over all my movable assets or shares to Hans Raj Gupta Charity Trust of which I am also a trustee.

11. That the value of my interest in all other immovable properties shall devolve upon the aforesaid Hans Raj Gupta Charity Trust.

12. Whatever other immovable property or share of immovable properties owned by me shall be made over to Hans Raj Gupta Charity Trust together with an obligation thereon to use them in pursuance of objective of that trust."

The testator had some unascertained contingent liabilities in the form of personal guarantees given by him for some limited company. He made provision in respect of these liabilities as well as by declaring as to who would own such liabilities. The gist of the Will, thus, is as under:

Rs. 15,000 to each grandson, granddaughters, great-grandson & great granddaughters;

Rs. 5,000 to children of daughters;

The firm named H.G. Gupta & M/s. Mrid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top