SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 3241

S.MURALIDHAR, SANJEEV NARULA
M. V. Sheshagiri – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ankur Chhibber, Adv., Prasanta Varma, Adv., Debajyoti Behiria G P, Adv., Shalu Goswami, Adv., Bharathi Raju, Adv., Namisha Gupta, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Narula, J.

The present petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondents to notionally re-fix the Petitioners' seniority by treating them appointed with effect from the date their batch mates were appointed. The Petitioners also seek consequential benefits that would accrue on account of notional re-fixation of seniority, especially the benefit of the "old pension scheme".

2. Facts and prayers of both the petitions being more or less similar, the same are being decided by a common order.

Factual Background

W.P. (C) No. 6275/2016

3. Staff Selection Commission (SSC) issued an advertisement for selection of Sub Inspectors (General Duty) through Central Police Organization (Sub Inspectors) Examination, 2002. The Petitioners applied for the aforesaid post and successfully qualified the written examination held on 12th January 2003. On 22nd May 2003, Respondents informed the Petitioner that he had been declared provisionally qualified to take the medical examination/interview. He appeared for the medical examinati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top