SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1575

HIMA KOHLI, VINOD GOEL
Dinesh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mukesh Kalia, Manav, M.L. Yadav, Dr. Kanwal Sapra, H.R. Dhamija, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Amit Gupta, APP.

JUDGMENT :

VINOD GOEL, J.

1. The present criminal appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 21.04.2004 and order on sentence dated 26.04.2004 in Sessions Case 1/2001 passed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi (‘ASJ’) arising out of FIR no.1086/2000 lodged at P.S. Uttam Nagar under Sections 302/201/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’) and Sessions Case 2/2001 arising out of FIR no. 1107/2000 lodged against Surender @ Lambu (A-1) at P.S. Uttam Nagar under Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act. The appellants were convicted for the following offences:

Name

Section

Sentence

1. Surender, Dinesh and Jatinder.

* Section 302 read with 120B of the IPC.

Life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1000. Rigorous imprisonment (‘RI’) of 3 months in default of fine.

2. Surinder, Dinesh, Jatinder and Kamaljeet.

* Section 201 read with 120B of the IPC.

RI for 4 years and a fine of Rs.1000/-. RI for 3 months in default of fine.

3. Surinder.

* Section 25 of the Arms Act.

RI of one year and a fine of Rs.1000/-. RI for 3 months in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top