I.S.MEHTA
Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Anchor Health And Beauty Care Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
I.S. Mehta, J.
Instant petitions are arising out of a complaint filed by Anchor Health & Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd i.e. No. 12/1/13 before the Court of Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate ('MM') seeking cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 166, 167, 463, 464, 465, 468, 469, 470 and 471 read with Section 34 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code for taking action against all the 13 Accused persons and for summoning all the Accused persons to face trial for the commission of the aforesaid offences.
2. Brief facts stated are that Petitioner in CRL.M.C. 3866/2014 Colgate-Palmolive Company, 300 Park Avenue, New York - 10022 USA (hereinafter referred to as Colgate USA) alongwith Petitioner 1 in CRL.M.C. 3946/2014 Colgate-Palmolive India Ltd., Colgate Research Centre, Main Street, Hiranandani Gardens, Pawai, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as Colgate India) filed a Civil Suit i.e. CS(OS) 304/2004 for permanent injunction, restraining infringement of design, passing off, damages and rendition of design against Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.
3. The said suit pertains to
Abhijt Pawar Vs. Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar and Another
Lee Kun Hee, President, Samsung Corporation, South Korea and Ors. Vs. State of U.P. and Ors.
Pepsi Foods Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Special Judicial of Magistrate
Rishipal Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Sarah Mathew Vs. Institute of Cardio Vascular
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.