HIMA KOHLI, VINOD GOEL
Matter Of: Anupama Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Suraj Bhan Bansal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hima Kohli, J.
The present appeal is directed against an order dated 12.3.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge allowing an application filed by the respondent No.1/plaintiff No.1 and respondent No.2/plaintiff No.2 under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, registered as I.A. No.23589/2015. By the impugned order, the suit for declaration, cancellation, possession, rendition of accounts and permanent and mandatory injunctions filed by the respondents in respect of agricultural land, measuring 21 Bighas, 16 Biswas comprising of Khasra No.50/23 Min (0-7), 21 (4-16), 22 (3-16), 58/3 (0-9), 1 (4-12), 2 (5-12), 10 (2-0), 26 (0-04) situated in the revenue estate of Village Bakoli, Tehsil Alipur, District North, known as Suraj Vatika, G.T. Road, Delhi (in short, 'suit property') has been decreed in their favour under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, declaring respondent No.2/plaintiff No.2 (HUF) as the owner and further declaring the Sale Deed dated 24.7.2013, executed by Rakesh Bansal (husband of the appellant and son of the respondent No.1/defendant No.1) in favour of his wife, the appellant/defendant No.2, as null and void. A decree of permanent injunction has been granted against the appellant and h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.