SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1735

PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Kular Construction Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Gurnam Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Ashok Mathur, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. The present case is a classic example of how litigation can be protracted by parties, only with a view to avoid payment of court fee. A case which ought to have been a simple suit for recovery has been designed as a declaratory suit leading to framing of a preliminary issue which is being decided by the present order. The preliminary issue framed in the suit is:

“Issue no.2 - Whether the present suit for declaration in respect of a recovery claim is maintainable in law?”

2. The reliefs prayed for in the suit are as under:

“(a) That the Decree of Declaration may kindly be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant declaring that the defendant has no right, title or interest in 4475 sq feet and 5000 sq feet commercial area on 3rd and 4th floor of the K-Mall, Link Road, Near Bus Stand, Ludhiana, Punjab respectively in case the past, present and future maintenance charges are not paid to the plaintiff.

or in the alternative

A Decree of Declaration may kindly be passed declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to adjust the unpaid maintenance charges and take back the commercial area from the defendant in view of the Agreement dated 25.05.200

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top