SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1772

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, J.
Deepika Veerwal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7747 of 2019; Civil Miscellaneous No. 32175 of 2019
Decided On : 22-10-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Divyesh Pratap Singh, Adv., Deeksha Gaur, Adv., Shantanu Sharma, Adv., Gaurav Varma, Adv., Kirtiman Singh, Adv., Prateek Dhanda, Adv., Waize Ali Noor, Adv., Rohan Anand, Adv., T. Singhdev, Adv., Arunima Pal, Adv., Puja Sarkar, Adv., Abijit, Adv., Tarun Verma, Adv., Manpret Kaur, Adv., Sumangla, Adv.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the inapplicability of Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust to postgraduate courses and the need for a balanced legal framework to prevent seat blocking without impeding candidates' rights to better their prospects.

Headnote:

Admission - DNB Broad Specialty (Post MBBS) course - [Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust, DNB Broad Specialty Courses including Direct 6 Years Courses (Post MBBS) January 2019, Admission Session] - The court addressed the applicability of Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust to postgraduate courses and the legal framework for allotment of seats in DNB courses. The court found that the directions in Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust do not apply to postgraduate courses, rendering the circulars dated 12.04.2019 and 01.05.2019 ineffective. The court emphasized the need for a balanced legal framework to prevent seat blocking without impeding candidates' rights to better their prospects.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was denied admission to the DNB (Post MBBS) course due to failure to produce original documents and blocking a seat in another college. The petitioner sought permission to participate in counselling for DNB courses after resigning from the previous seat.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the directions in Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust do not apply to postgraduate courses, rendering the circulars dated 12.04.2019 and 01.05.2019 ineffective. The court emphasized the need for a balanced legal framework to prevent seat blocking without impeding candidates' rights to better their prospects.

Issues: The main issue was the applicability of Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust to postgraduate courses and the legal framework for allotment of seats in DNB courses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the directions in Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust do not apply to postgraduate courses, rendering the circulars dated 12.04.2019 and 01.05.2019 ineffective. The court emphasized the need for a balanced legal framework to prevent seat blocking without impeding candidates' rights to better their prospects.

Final Decision: The court directed the NBE to consider allotting a seat to the petitioner in the DNB course if available and emphasized the need for clarity in the legal framework for seat allotment in succeeding academic sessions.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Shakdher, J.

Preface: -

1. The main grievance of the petitioner veers around denial of admission to her in the DNB Broad Specialty (Post MBBS) course [in short 'DNB (Post MBBS) course'] in the academic session January 2019 by respondent no. 2 i.e. the National Board of Examinations (hereafter referred to as 'the NBE').

2. The NBE denied admission to the petitioner on two short grounds. First, that she was unable to produce the requisite documents/certificates, in original during the document/certificate verification process. Second, that she had blocked a seat as she had secured admission in the All India Quota in respondent no. 3 college i.e. VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi (hereafter referred to as 'VMMC'). It is this which, essentially, has propelled the petitioner to approach this court via the instant writ petition. Thus, to adjudicate on the instant petition, the following broad facts are required to be noticed.

    Background: -

2.1 The petitioner avers that she completed her MBBS course from Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University, Karad, Maharashtra (in short 'KIMS') on 23.02.2013. Thereafter, the petitioner sat for the UPSC exam and upon being declared successful, was appointed as a medical officer on 12.09.2014, in DHS cadre (GDMO sub-cadre) in the Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (in short 'GNCTD').

2.2 The petitioner, upon her appointment, was posted in the Lok Nayak Hospital. The petitioner sat for the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test Post Graduate, 2019 [in short 2019 NEET (PG)'] on 06.01.2019 after informing her superiors in Lok Nayak Hospital via a communication dated 06.11.2018.

2.3 The 2019 NEET (PG) result was declared on 31.01.2019. The petitioner obtained 643 marks out of a total of 1200 marks and consequently was ranked 10437. Given this development, the petitioner, vide letter dated 19.02.2019, once again, sought the permission of her superiors at Lok Nayak Hospital for participation in the counselling which would follow qua postgraduate courses in MD/MS Diploma/DNB. In this communication, the petitioner also indicated that she would require study leave, in case, she was offered a seat after the counselling.

2.4 On 27.03.2019, the petitioner received a Provisional Allotment Letter (in short 'PAL'). Via the PAL, the petitioner was intimated that she had secured a seat in the All India Quota in "DEG. Preventive Social Medicine" [hereafter referred to as 'MD (Community Medicine)'] in VMMC.

2.5 Accordingly, the petitioner fulfilled all formalities which included execution of a surety bond on 02.04.2019 whereby she gave an undertaking that she would be liable to pay a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- to VMMC if any of the following circumstances occurred.

(a) She did not join the concerned course at the allotted institution on or before the stipulated date.

(b) She left the concerned course before its completion.

(c) If her admission/registration was cancelled/terminated by the University on account of unsatisfactory performance or indiscipline.

2.6 More importantly, besides executing the surety bond, the petitioner also deposited her documents/certificates in original with VMMC.

2.7 Consequently, on 03.04.2019, the petitioner received a formal admission letter which evidenced the fact that she had obtained admission in MD (Community Medicine) with VMMC. The admission, though, was subject to the petitioner submitting a "No Objection Certificate" (in short 'NOC') from her employer i.e. GNCTD.

2.8 On 12.04.2019, Government of India, Directorate General of Health Services (in short 'DGHS') took out a public notice stating that the 2019 NEET (PG) candidates who had joined the allotted seat in round I (one) and had given their willingness for upgradation in round II (two) at the reporting institute and had not been upgraded in round II (tw

                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                            1
                            2
                            3
                            4
                            5
                            6
                            7
                            8
                            9
                            10
                            11
                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                            supreme today icon
                            logo-black

                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                            Please visit our Training & Support
                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                            qr

                            Scan Me!

                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                            whatsapp-icon Back to top