SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Del) 195

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BRIJESH SETHI, J.
Sachindra Priyadarshi – Petitioner
Versus
State (NCT) Of Delhi – Respondent
Bail Appln. 201 OF 2020
Decided On : 18-03-2020

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Gopal Jha and Mr. Shreyash Bhardwaj, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Ld. APP

The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail applications are to be decided on the basis of their peculiar facts and circumstances, and the nature and gravity of the offence are crucial factors in determining the grounds for bail.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Serious Offences - The court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner who was accused of serious offences including making physical relations with the prosecutrix on the threat of uploading her nude photos and videos on social media, and making false promises of marriage. The court considered the nature and gravity of the offence and found no grounds for bail at this stage.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C in a case involving serious allegations of making physical relations with the prosecutrix on the threat of uploading her nude photos and videos on social media, and making false promises of marriage. The prosecutrix alleged that the petitioner had made sexual relations with her several times under threat and had also got her pregnant twice, which he got aborted without consulting any Doctor.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the allegations against the petitioner were serious in nature and that no grounds for bail were made out at this stage. The court considered the statement of the prosecutrix under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the evidence seized during the investigation to support the allegations.

Issues: The issues involved in the case included the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner, the nature and gravity of the offence, and whether there were grounds for bail at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and emphasized that each bail application is to be decided on its own merits. The court also highlighted the seriousness of the allegations and the evidence supporting the prosecutrix's statement.

Final Decision: The bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by the court, considering the serious nature of the allegations and finding no grounds for bail at this stage.

JUDGMENT :

BRIJESH SETHI, J.

1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of a bail application filed under section 439 Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner Sachindra Priyadarshi in FIR No. 387/2019 u/s. 328/376/323/506 IPC, PS Mandawali Fazalpur.

2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated. Petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2019. There is no absolutely no material available to connect the petitioner with the commission of offence. It is submitted petitioner has been falsely implicated by the prosecutrix as petitioner’s marriage has been fixed and finalized by his parents which annoyed the prosecutrix and this fact is evident from the chat and conversation between the petitioner and prosecutrix. It is further submitted that there was no physical relationship between the prosectrix and petitioner and no promise for marriage was ever made by the petitioner. Exchange of messages between the victim and petitioner does not suggest that victim was under threat. Police has completed the investigation and custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. It is, therefore, prayed that petitioner be released on bail in the interest of justice.

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner, in support of its submissions, has relied upon the following case law:-

(a). Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra & Anr., (2019) 9 SCC 608;

(b). Rohit Chauhan v. State of NCT of Delhi, 2013 SCC Online Del 2016.

4. I have gone through the above case law. It is a settled law that each bail application is to be decided on the basis of its peculiar facts and circumstances. No straitjacket formula can be laid own for dispose of the bail application. So far as the cases cited by Ld. Counsel are concerned, these are distinguishable on the basis of the facts and circumstances stated therein.

5. Ld. APP for the State has opposed both the bail application on the ground that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature. Petitioner has not only made physical relation with the prosecutrix but also took her objectionable photo and video. Ld. APP, has therefore, prayed for dismissal of bail application.

6. I have considered the rival submissions. As per prosecution version, on 29.11.2019 a complaint was made by prosecutrix in which she has alleged on 22.09.2018, petitioner called her at his house and when she reached there, petitioner offered a glass of cold drink and after consuming the same, she became unconscious. When she gained consciousness, there was no clothe on her body and petitioner told her that he had made sexual relationship with her as he liked her too much and could not control himself. Petitioner also threatened her that if she disclosed this thing to anybody, he will upload her naked photos and videos on social media. Under threat the petitioner made physical relation with her several time. Statement of prosecutrix under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded in which she had corroborated all the facts made in her complaint. During investigation, two mobile phone of the petitioner were seized to substantiate the allegations of taking obscene photos and videos of the victim. All the seized exhibits have been sent to FSL for expert opinion and the result of the same is still awaited.

7. The above allegations appearing against the petitioner are serious in nature. Petitioner has made physical relations with the prosecutrix many times on the threat of uploading her nude photos and video on social media. Petitioner has also made false promise of marriage. Prosecutrix got pregnant twice but petitioner got the pregnancy aborted without consulting any Doctor. Keeping in mind the nature and gravity of offence, no grounds for bail are made out at this stage. The bail application is, therefore, dismissed and stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top