S. A. R. R. Public Company Ltd vs Avon Infracon Pvt Ltd

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(Del) 1241

JAYANT NATH
S. A. R. R. Public Company Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Avon Infracon Pvt Ltd – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Abhinav Vashisht, Advocate, Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate, Amit Singh Chauhan, Advocate, Amit Sibal, Advocate, Jayant Mehta, Advocate, Nitin Wadhwa, Advocate, Prateek Sisodia, Advocate, Kumar Sambhav, Advocate, Saurabh Batra, Advocate, Anupam Lal Das, Advocate, Rajiv Nayar, Advocate, Ranendra Barot, Advocate, Ashim Sood, Advocate, Atul N, Advocate, Apoorva Gupta, Advocate, Arvind Nigam, Advocate, Amit Kr Mishra, Advocate, Etisha Srivastava, Advocate, Akshat Hansaria, Advocate, Yash Kumar, Advocate, Mihil Sarda, Advocate, Mehtab Singh Sandhu, Advocate, Siddharth Dutta, Advocate, Davesh Kumar Chauvia, Advocate, Sameer Kumar, Advocate, Nidhi Sahah, Advocate, Sandeep Sethi, Advocate, Vijay Nair, Advocate, Manoranjan Sharma, Advocate

Table of Content
1. relief sought by plaintiff. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background on plaintiff and agreements. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. details on defaults and appointment of receiver. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. legal proceedings initiated against plaintiff. (Para 12)
5. defendants' objections raised. (Para 13)
6. arguments against maintainability of the suit. (Para 14 , 15)
7. jurisdiction-related contentions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
8. arguments on defendants' rights and agreements. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
9. court observations on defendants' obligations. (Para 22 , 23)
10. discussion on privity and legal standing. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
11. clarification on ownership and agreements. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
12. extrinsic evidence in contractual interpretation. (Para 31 , 32)
13. legal doctrines on privity and conduct. (Para 33 , 34)
14. judicial observations on corporate structures. (Para 35 , 36 , 37)
15. jurisdiction and governing law considerations. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)
16. conclusion on jurisdiction clauses. (Para 41 , 42)
17. final considerations on the case. (Para 43 , 44)
18. court's decision on interim order. (Para 48 , 49 , 50)

JUDGMENT

Jayant Nath, J. - By this order I will dispose of IA No. 14239/2018 filed b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(Del) 1241

JAYANT NATHS. A. R. R. Public Company Ltd – AppellantVersusAvon Infracon Pvt Ltd – Respondent

Cases Referred (13)

JAYANT NATH
S. A. R. R. Public Company Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Avon Infracon Pvt Ltd – Respondent