SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 400

DIPAK MISRA, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
CHERAN PROPERTIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KASTURI AND SONS LIMITED – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J

1. The appeals in the present case arise under Section 423 of the Companies Act, 2013 against a judgment and order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal [NCLAT] dated 18 July 2017. The NCLAT has dismissed an appeal filed against an order dated 6 March 2017 of the National Company Law Tribunal [NCLT] at its Chennai Bench.

2. The second respondent is a company by the name of Sporting Pastime India Limited [SPIL]. It was incorporated on 2 May 1994, as a fully owned subsidiary of the first respondent, Kasturi & Sons Limited [KSL]. On 19 July 2004 an agreement was entered into between KC Palanisamy[KCP] (the third respondent), KSL (the first respondent) and SPIL and a company by the name of Hindcorp Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (Hindcorp). Under the agreement SPIL was to allot 240 lakh equity shares of Rs 10 each, fully paid up at par to KSL against the book debts due by SPIL to KSL. KSL offered to sell to KCP or his nominees 243 lakh equity shares representing 90 per cent of the total paid up share capital for a lumpsum consideration of Rs 2,31,50,000.





























































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top