SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Del) 1267

S.MURALIDHAR, V.KAMESWAR RAO
P. V. Kapur – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Petitioner In Person, Advocate, Sidhant Kapur, Advocate, Kaveri Gupta, Advocate, Jitender Panchal, Advocate, Anjana Gosain, Advocate, Shalini Nair, Advocate, Ravinder Sethi, Advocate, Sandeep Sethi, Advocate, Ateev Mathur, Advocate, Jagriti Ahuja, Advocate, Amol Sharma, Advocate, Kanika Agnihotri, Advocate, Arjun Rekhi, Advocate, Karanjot Singh Mainee, Advocate, Punit Bhalla, Advocate, Ajjay Arora, Advocate, Kapil Dutta, Advocate, Rajat Rajoria Singh, Advocate, Anuj Bhargava, Advocate, Nilesh Bijlani, Advocate, Santosh Tripathi, Advocate, Shashank Tiwari, Advocate, Ajay Verma, Advocate, Sandeep Gupta, Advocate, Mini Pushkarna, Advocate, Swagata Bhuyan, Advocate, Shiva Pandey, Advocate, Khushboo Nahar, Advocate, Ajjay Aroraa, Advocate, Sumit Bansal, Advocate, S. Anand, Advocate, Udaibir Singh, Advocate, Vishnushree, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S. Muralidhar, J. - Introduction

    1.1 These are four petitions which highlight the chaos resulting partly from the inadequate provisions, and partly the improper implementation, of the Master Plans for Delhi ("MPD"), both for 2001 and 2021. The particular focus in these petitions is on the "mixed use regulations" forming part of the MPD.

    1.2 A common sight in many of Delhi''s residential colonies these days is one of congestion and the ubiquitous lack of "parking space" for vehicles of not just residents but also visitors. Increasingly, there is a gradual transformation of living spaces into commercial ones. What, to begin with, was a two-storied residential house now has a business operating on either or both floors. This inevitably increases the strain on the already stretched infrastructure and resources. Since the rapidity of these changes was not anticipated by the MPD, the assumptions that formed its basis appear in practice to have been underestimated.

    1.3 The adverse effects of the above changes on the resident population of one such "up-scale" Delhi colony, Greater Kailash-I ("GK-I") drove Mr. P. V. Kapur, a Senior Advocate of this Court and a resident of GK-I, to f

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top