Back
Y. K. SABHARWAL, C. K. THAKKER, P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
DELHI PRADESH CITIZEN COUNCIL – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER
1. Considering the large - scale violation of various laws, this Court by judgment dated 16 - 2 - 2006 in M.C Mehta v. Union of India1 issued various directions for taking immediate steps to seal residential premises being f misused for commercial activities. A Monitoring Committee was constituted to ensure compliance with law and directions of this Court. The judgment, by way of illustration, highlighted various illegal and unauthorised users in many colonies despite the orders and directions made from time to time. After the judgment, in terms of directions contained therein, the sealing of the premises commenced. This led to some of the applicants filing applications in this Court seeking time to stop the misuser on giving 9 undertaking that the applicants on their own would stop the same by 30 - 6 - 2006.
2. According to the report of the Monitoring Committee, 40,814 affidavits were filed stating therein that the misuser would be stopped by 30 - 6 - 2006. Further, 5006 commercial establishments were sealed by the time the impugned legislation was enacted. In terms of the order dated 1 - 8 - 2006 we have admitted the petitions and issued rule observing that serious challen
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
