C.HARI SHANKAR
Directorate Of Enforcement – Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Saxena – Respondent
JUDGMENT
C. Hari Shankar, J. - An interesting issue, involving the interplay between Section 306, and Section 308, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Cr PC", or "the 1973 Cr PC"), arises for consideration in the present case.
Facts, and the impugned Order
2. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered RC No. 217-2013A-0003, against the respondent, on 12th March, 2013, alleging commission of offences, by him, punishable under Section 420, read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 7, 8, 9, 12 and 13(1)(d), read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Inasmuch as the allegations, against the respondent (and others arraigned with him) indicated commission of offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "the PMLA"), ECIR No. 15/DLZO/2014 was also registered against, inter alia, the respondent, on 3rd July, 2014, by the Directorate of Enforcement (the petitioner herein).
3. Given the limited controversy before me, which is purely legal in nature and turns on the interpretation of Sections 306 and 308 of the Cr PC, it is not necessary to allude, to
Ballabhadas Mathurdas Lakhani vs. Municipal Committee, Malkapur
Bhavnagar University vs. Palitana Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Fida Hussain vs. Moradabad Development Authority
Fuzlunbi vs. K. Khader Vali and Anr.
Gian Chand vs. State of Haryana
In re: Chief Judicial Magistrate
Megh Singh vs. State of Punjab
Pruthvirajsinh Nodhubha Jadeja vs. Jayeshkumar Chhakkadas Shah
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.