RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Reena – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. - The present Revision Petition U/s 397/401 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner against the impugned order on charge dated 23.03.2015 passed by Ld. ASJ, Delhi, thereby framing charges against the petitioner under Section 306 IPC in criminal case titled as "State Vs. Reena", FIR No. 185/2010 registered at P.S. Prasad Nagar.
2. In brief the facts of the case are that the marriage between deceased Rahul Kumar Prasad and petitioner/accused Reena Prasad was solemnized on 17.04.2009 and thereafter they started residing together at Delhi. After sometime matrimonial disputes arose between them and the petitioner left the company of deceased on 28.06.2010 and went to live with her parents at Sikkim. It is alleged that alongwith her she took gold jewellery worth Rs. 15 Lakh and a cash of Rs. 3 Lakh which belonged to deceased Rahul Kumar Prasad. In regard to this, it is alleged that deceased Rahul Kumar Prasad had filed a complaint with the police on 29.06.2010. Deceased Rahul Kumar Prasad also filed two cases including a petition U/s 9 of the H.M.A. for Restitution of Conjugal Right. Despite that petitioner Reena refused to join the co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.