SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Arvind Kejriwal – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent
What is the duty of the investigating agency to furnish all relevant documents and statements to the accused under Cr.P.C. and Article 21? What is the status and admissibility of a witness statement recorded in the case diary (e.g., V.K. Jain’s 21.02.2018 statement) for consideration at the charge stage under Cr.P.C.? What are the powers and limitations of Sections 173(5), 173(6), and 207 Cr.P.C. in supplying documents to the accused, and how should courts handle withheld or non-supplied materials to ensure a fair trial?
Key Points: - The court emphasizes that the investigating agency must conduct a free and fair investigation and present all evidences without selective disclosure. (!) - The statement of V.K. Jain dated 21.02.2018, though part of the case diary and not signed by the IO, should be considered at the time of passing the order on charge. (!) (!) (!) - Section 207 Cr.P.C. requires the Magistrate to furnish to the accused a copy of police report, FIR, statements under 161, confessions/164, and other documents the prosecution proposes to rely on, with provisions for redaction or inspection where appropriate. (!) (!) (!) - Sections 173(5) and (6) together with the first proviso to Section 207 Cr.P.C. mandate forwarding all statements under 161 and other documents to the Magistrate for supply to the accused; withholding parts requires justification, and the Magistrate may permit inspection if the document is voluminous. (!) (!) (!) (!) - The duty is to forward all documents, including those not relied upon by the prosecution, to enable fair defense; failure to do so can constitute miscarriage of justice. (!) (!) - Court set aside the revisional order and directed the Trial Court to consider the 21.02.2018 statement at the charge stage, reinforcing fair-trial principles. (!) (!)
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - Present petition has been filed under sections 482/483 Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 24.07.2019 passed by learned ASJ (MPs/MLAs cases), Rouse Avenue Court Complex, New Delhi in CR.REV. No.7/2019 titled as Manish Sisodia & Anr. vs. State & Anr. whereby the said Court did not allow to supply some crucial documents as prayed/required in the application under Section 207 Cr.P.C. filed on the behalf of the accused in this case, without following the procedure as prescribed under Cr.P.C.
2. The chargesheet in FIR No 54/2018 under section 186/323/353/332/ 342/149/504/506-II/120-B/109/114/34 IPC filed on 13.08.2020 before learned ACMM, Patiala House Court against the petitioners and named as accused. The Petitioner No.1 herein filed an application under section 207 Criminal Procedure Code for supply of certain deficient documents inter alia including the copy of the statement of one witness Sh.V.K. Jain recorded on 21.02.2018 and audio/video recording of the examination of the petitioners. Barring the supply of legible copy of the documents mentioned in the application learned ACMM decl
Bata & Others versus Anama Behera
Dr. G. Ramachandrappa vs. Padma Ramachandrappa
Gopal Chauhan versus Smt. Satya & Anr.
Kunhayammed & Ors. vs. State of Kerala & Ors.
Manjeet Singh Khera vs. State of Maharashtra
Naresh Kumar Yadav vs. Ravindra Kumar & Ors.
Noor Khan vs. State of Rajasthan
Pushpadevi M. Jatia vs. M.L. Wadhavan & Ors.
Shakila Abdul Gafar Khan (Smt.) vs. Vasant Raghunath Dhoble and Anr.
Shankar Ramchandra Abhyankar vs. Krishnaji Dattatraya Bapat
State of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravikant Sharma & Ors.
Sunita Devi vs. State of Bihar & Anr.
Zahira Habibullah H. Sheikh and Anr. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.