SURESH KUMAR KAIT
P. C. Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The hearing of the appeal was conducted through video conferencing.
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant seeking to set aside the judgment dated 24.05.2010 passed by Special Judge, Delhi in CC No.31/2008 [CC No.62/1999 (old number)], vide which he has been held guilty and convicted for the offences under Sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the “PC Act”) and order on sentence dated 26.05.2010, vide which he has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine and default clause.
2. The case of prosecution against the appellant is that on 28.02.1996 while working as Assistant Commissioner-V (Appeals), Sales Tax Department, Bikri Kar Bhawan, New Delhi, demanded a sum of Rs.4,000/- as illegal gratification from Shri Gulshan Sikri Proprietor of M/s Filtrex India, Nangal Raya, New Delhi, for favouring him in the matter of appeal pending before him and in furtherance of this demand, he on 01.03.1996 at about 12.40 pm in the Sales Tax Office, I.P. Estate, New Delhi demanded a sum of Rs. 4,000/- from Shri Gulshan Sikri, complainant and directed the complainant to h
State of Maharashtra Vs. Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede
P. Satyanarayana Murthy Vs. District Inspector of Police
Sujit Biswas vs. State of Assam
Nilesh Dinkar Paradkar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mahabir Prasad Verma Vs. Dr. Surinder Kaur
Neera Yadav v. CBI: MANU/SC/0931/2017 : (2017) 8 SCC 757
C.K. Jaffer Shareiff v. State: MANU/SC/0960/2012 : (2013) 1 SCC 205
R. Venkatkrishnan vs. CBI: MANU/SC/1411/2009 : (2009) 11 SCC 737
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.