SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 222

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
State (NCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Jiwan Kant Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Avi Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Aditya Jain, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This revision petition filed under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C is directed against the order dated 03.01.2018, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-Special Fast Track Court, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, in Case No.342/2017 where by the Additional Session Judge has discharged the accused from the charges under Sections 376, 328, 354A, 323, 506 and 509 IPC.

2. FIR No.23/2016, dated 05.01.2016 was registered at Police Station Safdarjung Enclave for offences under Sections 376, 328, 354A, 323, 506 and 509 IPC.

3. In the FIR the prosecutrix stated that she had been working in two companies Faison World Hauz Khas and Perfect Organiser belonging to the accused/respondent No.1 since six months prior to the lodging the complaint. It is stated that the respondent No.1 told the prosecutrix that he had divorced his wife and was staying separately and needed a capable woman to handle his work. It is stated by the prosecutrix that the accused made her the CEO and later partner in one of the said companies. The prosecutrix states that since there was no separate place for work, work related meetings and talks regarding work were held at the home of the accused/respondent No.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top