SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 233

SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Nitin Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sunita Sharma – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Pooja Chhabra, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mamta Mayer, K.K. Krishan Prabhu, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

1. Vide above captioned first petition, petitioner/husband is seeking quashing of order dated 16.07.2020 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dawarka, vide which amount of interim maintenance has been enhanced to Rs.22,000/- against the order dated 17.09.2019 passed by the learned trial court, whereby he has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.10,000/- p.m. to respondent/ wife.

2. Vide above captioned second petition, petitioner/wife is seeking modification of the order dated 16.07.2020 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka, vide which interim maintenance amount of Rs.10,000/- per month awarded by the trial court has been enhanced to Rs.22,000/- while claiming it to be on the lower side.

3. The subject matter of dispute in these petitions is essentially a matrimonial dispute. Since the orders impugned in both the petitions are common, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

4. In a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top