SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 248

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, J.
Aman Lekhi & Others – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others – Respondent
W.P.(C). No. 3263 of 2014 & CM. Nos. 6739, 16004 of 2014, 28864, 43902, 48435, 53450 of 2018, 5953, 8608-10, 12600 of 2020
Decided On : 11-02-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Manali Singhal, Santosh Sachin, Deepak S. Rawat, Aanchal Kapoor, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Roshni Namboodiry, Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC, Arjun Pant, Pushkar Sood, Satya Prakash Singh, Febin M. Varghese, Samuel David, Advocates, Pinky Anand, Sr. Advocate, Manoj K. Das, Kirti Dua, Akshita Goyal, Sumit Teterwal, Shailesh Singh, Anil Grover, SC, Tushar Sannu, ASC, Ankita Bhadouriya, Noopur Singhal, Misha Vij, Biraja Mahapatra, Arjun Mitra, Brijesh Kumar Tamber, Ratik Sharma, Akash Tyagi, Advocates.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Master Plan for Delhi 2021 - Environment Protection Act, 1986 - Writ of Mandamus regarding redevelopment project at Kidwai Nagar (East) was sought by residents citing violations of MPD 2021, traffic congestion, and environmental concerns. (Para 1)

(B) Commercial Usage Regulations - The court addressed the issue of allowable commercial use within residential developments, emphasizing statutory limits on FAR and mixed-use regulations in urban redevelopment projects. (Para 100)

(C) Traffic Impact Assessments - The absence of comprehensive traffic assessments before project approvals was critically examined, highlighting the ongoing challenges in infrastructure management due to urban expansion. The court mandated adherence to traffic management solutions. (Para 111-113)

(D) Environmental Concerns - The court underscored the requirement of an Environmental Impact Assessment for any large-scale redevelopment, ensuring compliance with ecological regulations and tree preservation mandates. (Para 129) (E) The court ultimately found that while irregularities existed regarding permitted commercial use and traffic management, the overall developmental goals served public interests, allowing the project to proceed under strict compliance of directives. (Para 130)

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

JUDGMENT :

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for the following relief:-

“(a) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing all the concerned agencies to ensure that the residential character of the colony of South Ex-II and the adjoining areas that have lost their residential nature due to unprecedented unchecked commercial growth is restored,

(b) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing the concerned authority to ensure that the illegal parking inside the colony is stopped forthwith,

(c) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing the respondent no. 3 to take action on the decision of the monitoring committee thereby denotifying the commercial street D8-D15 and take appropriate action against the illegal commercialization of streets D1-D7 and M1-M10, and

(d) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing the Environment Pollution Control Authority (EPCA) to give a comprehensive report on the impact of commercialization and development of Kidwai Nagar on the ring road and residents of colonies along the ring road with full details of environmental impact.

(e) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing the EPCA to give detailed survey and furnish report on the illegal commercial activities and also to produce the survey report and all other related facts based on which the illegal commercial activity has been permitted.

(f) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing TERI (The Energy and Research Institute) and DPCC (Delhi Pollution Control Committee) to submit report of sound and air pollution in the area. Also the location of testing instruments should be decided in consultation with the Petitioners in writing so that the true and correct reading of the instruments can be ensured.

(g) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing the Fire Department and Delhi Traffic Police to give report confirming the free access in case of emergency.

(h) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing EPCA/Fire Dept./Delhi Traffic Police to conduct a survey and provide their report/NOC whether NDSE-2 is suitable to access in case of emergency on account of presence of commercial activity.

(i) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing MCD/DDA to produce the rights/obligations under category B of House Tax classifications. Also to direct MCD to disclose on affidavit the house tax collected from South Ex residential area and its utilization in the residential area in the past 10 years.

(j) Pass a writ of mandamus thereby directing all the concerned agencies that the green belt within and surrounding the colony is protected and not used for any construction.

(k) Pass a writ of prohibition thereby restraining the re-development of Kidwai Nagar project till the present problems of traffic congestion and parking are not addressed by the respondent authorities.

(l) Pass a writ of mandamus directing ASI to disclose if and as to how it had granted permission of such huge project next to the heritage monument Tomb of Darya Khan.”

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she wishes to confine her prayer only to the issues pertaining to redevelopment of Kidwai Nagar (East) and for the other prayers, the petitioners will be seeking appropriate remedy in accordance with law, if so advised. In fact, it is noticed that right from the filing of the petition, the focus of the petition has been only on the redevelopment of Kidwai Nagar (East). The petition is therefore, confined to this limited challenge, granting leave to agitate the other issues in an appropriate proceedings.

THE PROJECT:

3. Before embarking to adjudicate on the issues involved in the present petition, it is noteworthy to have an overview of the Project of redevelopment of Kidwai Nagar (East).

4. It is stated by the respondent no. 1 that Kidwai Nagar (East) was identified as one of the colonies in the Zonal Development Plan of Zone- D in 1993 with a mission to combat the acute shortage of Government housing, especially in the National Capital Region, and the long waiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top