Key Points: - The judgment emphasizes that illegal construction in violation of sanctioned plans should be dealt with harshly and demolition ordered where appropriate (!) (!) (!) . - It analyzes rule-based possibilities for regularisation, particularly Rule 25(2) and its applicability to deviations from sanctioned plans (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) . - It discusses penalties, compensation obligations to flat purchasers, and costs/demands for demolition and compliance to ensure planned development (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) . - It references the roles and actions of municipal authorities, stop-work notices, and the need for due process and natural justice in demolitions and regularisation processes (!) (!) (!) . - It highlights public interest and the impact of unauthorized constructions on residents, infrastructure, and urban planning (!) (!) (!) . - It notes that even where regularisation is sought, it cannot override clear violations of sanctioned plans and statutory notices (!) (!) . - It underscores the Court’s stance on zero tolerance toward illegal constructions and the necessity of prompt demolition after due processes (!) (!) .

How to address violation of sanctioned building plans and enforcement of demolition in illegal/unauthorized constructions?

What is the legal framework for regularisation of unauthorized construction and the limits of Rule 25(2) in Kolkata Municipal Corporation Building Rules?

What are the consequences and remedies for builders and purchasers when illegal constructions are demolished or regularised?