R.K.GAUBA
JATINDER SINGH ANAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.K.Gauba, J.
The second respondent in these petitions was married to the first petitioner, common to both the matters, as per Sikh Rites and Ceremonies on 08.09.2013. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her valuable articles on her complaint, first information report (FIR) no. 276/2015 (first case) having been registered by police station South Campus on 20.05.2015 involving offences punishable under Sections 506/509/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Subsequently, on her complaint another FIR no. 94/2015 (second case) was registered on 02.09.2015 with police station CWC, Nanak Pura, the case involving offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC. The first case is directed against the husband, his brother-in-law, his uncle and his father (first to fourth petitioners respectively in Crl.M.C. 400/2019) while the second FIR was directed against the husband, his father, his mother, brother-in-law and his sisters (first to sixth petitioners in Crl.M.C. 401/2019).
2. The parties, however, were persuaded to enter into an amicable settlement through the process of mediation and
State of Karnakata v. L Muniswamy
State of Karnataka v. M. Devendrappa
B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr.
Jitendra Raghuvanshi v. Babita Raghuvanshi
Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.