SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 382

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.
In the Matter of: Ram Kishan – Petitioner
Versus
The State – Respondent
Crl. Rev. Pet. No. 659 of 2018
Decided On : 25-06-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Mr. M.K. Vasisht, Ms. Pallavi Shegal.
For the Respondents: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, Mr. Roshal Lal.

Point of Law: Motor Accident - Causing death by negligence - Conviction confirmed - Power of a revisional court - It is well settled that a revisional court is not an appellate court and it cannot substitute its conclusion to the one arrived at by two courts just because another view is possible.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 397/401 r/w 482 - Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 279 and 304A - Accident - Death - Revision petition - Accident rash and negligent manner - Complainant is the star witness of prosecution he states that in front of Cooperative where one bus came from Badarpur side at a high speed in a rash and negligent manner hit against one motorcycle - As a result, occupants of motorcycle fell down and sustained injuries he stated that he raised an alarm upon which public persons gathered on spot - One person from public got bus stopped - He has stated that accident has taken place due to fault of petitioner - PW-1 stated that he diverted traffic in order to take care of injured. PCR van reached on spot and removed injured to Apollo hospital as other person had passed away on spot.

Finding of the Court:

Two persons have died in the accident. No one can and much less persons driving roadways buses can be permitted to drive in rash and negligent manner so as to put the lives of the passengers and other persons in danger. This Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Section 368 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner and reduce the sentence awarded to petitioner - There is no reason to disbelieve him. PW-1 has no animosity towards the accused. He has withstood a detailed cross-examination - Court does not find any infirmity in the judgment of court below.

Result: Revision Petition is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.

1. This revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment dated 30.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Judge (NDPS), South East, Saket Courts Complex in C.A. No. 236/2018. The learned Additional Sessions Judge by the judgment impugned herein has affirmed the judgment dated 04.04.2018 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate convicting the petitioner for offences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC and order on sentence dated 17.04.2018 sentencing the petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months for offence under Section 279 IPC and simple imprisonment for two years for offence under Section 304A IPC and directing the petitioner to pay a compensation of Rs. 50,000/- to the Legal Representatives of the victim.

2. The facts in brief leading to the present revision petition are as under:-

    (a) PW-1, Ct. Satpal, Police Station Sarita Vihar who gave information vide DD No. 25A regarding an accident opposite A-19 Mohan Cooperative Mathura Road.

(b) On receiving the said information, the Police reached the spot. PW-1 gave a statement that on 30.05.2010, while working at Police Station Sarita Vihar, he was on beat duty on Mathura Road, Delhi at about 12:40 p.m. in front of A-19 Mohan Cooperative the bus bearing registration No. HR-38L-7814 came from Badarpur side at a high speed in a rash and negligent manner and hit the right side of the bus against one motorcycle bearing registration No. UP-14AY-8745. The occupants of motorcycle fell down and sustained injuries. There were two persons on the motorcycle. The bus driver tried to flee from the spot. PW-1 stated that he told one person to apprehend the driver. He diverted the traffic in order to take care of injured. PCR van reached on the spot and removed one of the injured who was alive to Apollo hospital and the other person who had already passed away was removed to AIIMS Trauma Centre by PCR van through HC Bhim Singh. The bus was chased and stopped by public near Police Station Sarita Vihar. The bus driver fled the spot. Photograph of the site, body of the deceased, offending vehicle and the motorcycle were taken from the spot. The accident had taken place due to rash and negligent driving of the bus driver. On the basis of the statement of PW-1, FIR No. 162/2010 was registered.

(c) The second occupant of the motorcycle who had been taken to the hospital also passed away. After investigation, charge sheet was filed for offences under Section 279 and 304A IPC. The charges were framed. To bring home their case, the prosecution examined nine witnesses.

(d) PW-1, Ct. Satpal, the complainant is the star witness of the prosecution. He states that on 30.05.2010 at around 12:40 p.m. in front of A-19, Mohan Cooperative where one bus bearing registration No. HR-38L-7814 came from Badarpur side at a high speed in a rash and negligent manner hit against one motorcycle No. UP-14AY-8745. As a result, occupants of motorcycle fell down and sustained injuries. He stated that he raised an alarm upon which public persons gathered on the spot. One person from the public got the bus stopped. He has stated that the accident has taken place due to fault of the petitioner. PW-1 stated that he diverted the traffic in order to take care of the injured. PCR van reached on the spot and removed the injured to Apollo hospital as other person had passed away on the spot. SI Krishan Kumar reached on the spot. He further states that the petitioner and conductor fled from the spot. During the cross-examination by the counsel for the defence, he stated that he has witnessed the accident. He denied the suggestion that the accident did not take place in his presence.

(e) PW-2, HC Bhim Singh stated that on 03.05.2010 at 10:00 a.m. he along with Ct. Ajay Pal reached the spot and saw motorcycle which had been hit by the bus. One person was lying dead on the spot. The body was taken to

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top