IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited - Petitioner
Versus
Lexicon Vanijya Private Limited. & Anr. - Respondents
O.M.P. (COMM.) 163 of 2021 & IA No. 5826 of 2021
Decided On : 02-08-2021
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - Arbitration Award - Liquidated damages - Power Purchase Agreement - Breach of Contract - Arbitral award rendered by an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of former Chief Justice of India and former Judge of Supreme Court of India as Presiding Arbitrator - Appeal - Whether NVVNL was entitled to recover liquidated damages from Lexicon as contemplated under PPA. NVVNL claimed that it was entitled to recover amount as liquidated damages being 10% of Performance Guarantee furnished by Lexicon, as according to NVVNL, Lexicon had failed to commission solar power plant for generating 10 MW capacity on or before the scheduled commissioning date.
Finding of the court : It is clear from the above that in certain circumstances relating to public utilities, it can be assumed that losses have been suffered on account of breach of contract even though there is no specific evidence to establish the exact quantum of loss suffered by public agency. In such cases, burden to prove that no loss has been incurred shifts on party in breach of Contract - Arbitral Tribunal had accepted costs, as submitted along with written submissions. NVVNL does not dispute that at a hearing held, a statement was furnished on behalf of Claimants including Lexicon that a sum of Rs. 1,55,00,000/- had been paid as arbitration fees, which was equally split among two claimants pursuing respective matter, one of them being Lexicon. Thus, Lexicon had incurred costs of Rs.77,50,000/- as arbitration fees. In addition, Lexicon also claimed amount and consultancy fees incurred by it. There is no material to indicate that NVVNL had at any stage disputed aforesaid costs. Since arbitration fees (which form bulk of costs awarded to Lexicon) is a matter of record, same requires no further proof. Court does not find that the costs awarded to NVVNL are either unreasonable or warrant any interference by this Court - Court does not find that costs awarded to NVVNL are either unreasonable or warrant any interference by this Court.
Result : Petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
1. NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited (hereinafter ‘NVVNL’) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the ‘A&C Act’) impugning an arbitral award dated 20.11.2020 (hereinafter ‘the impugned award’) rendered by an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of Justice (Retired) V.N. Khare, former Chief Justice of India, Mr Ambarish Dave and Justice (Retired) D.P. Wadhwa, former Judge of the Supreme Court of India as the Presiding Arbitrator.
2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between NVVNL and respondent no.1 (hereafter ‘Lexicon’) in connection with the Power Purchase Agreement (hereinafter the ‘PPA’) entered into between NVVNL and Lexicon
3. Essentially, the dispute between NVVNL and Lexicon revolve around the question whether NVVNL was entitled to recover liquidated damages from Lexicon as contemplated under the PPA. NVVNL claimed that it was entitled to recover Rs.2,77,27,000/- (Rupees Two Crores Seventy-Seven Lacs and Twenty-Seven Thousand only) as liquidated damages being 10% of the Performance Guarantee furnished by Lexicon, as according to NVVNL, Lexicon had failed to commission the solar power plant for generating 10 MW capacity on or before the scheduled commissioning date
4. According to NVVNL, Lexicon had commissioned 5 MW capacity on or before 26.02.2013 (the Scheduled Commissioning Date) and had commissioned the balance 5 MW by 01.03.2013, that is, after a delay of three days. NVVNL claimed that it was thus, entitled to recover half of 20% of the Performance Bank Guarantee in terms of Clause 4.6 of the PPA. Lexicon disputed the aforesaid claim as according to Lexicon it had commissioned the solar power generating project before the Scheduled Commissioning Date. It claimed that it had completed and installed 10 MW of solar power generating capacity on 21.02.2013.
5. The Arbitral Tribunal found in favour of Lexicon and accepted its contention that it had completed and installed the solar power plant with 10 MW capacity on or before the Scheduled Commissioning Date of 26.02.2013. Accordingly, the Tribunal held that NVVNL was not entitled to recover any liquidated damages. The Arbitral Tribunal further held that not was not established that NVVL had suffered any loss on account of the three days delay in completion of a part of the project. Therefore, in any event, NVVNL could not recover the said damages without establishing that it had suffered any loss.
6. Accordingly, the Arbitral Tribunal directed that the Performance Bank Guarantee furnished by Lexicon be discharged. It also awarded costs of Rs.1,08,66,000/- (Rupees One Crore Eight Lacs and Sixty-Six Thousand only) in favour of Lexicon.
7. It is contended on behalf of NVVNL that the impugned award is perverse and is contrary to the terms of the PPA. It is contended on behalf of NVVNL that the impugned award disregards the minutes of the Commissioning Committee of 25.02.2013- 26.02.2013 – which recorded that Lexicon had electrically connected only 7.06 MW capacity as on 25.02.2013 – and therefore, the impugned award is patently illegal and is liable to be set aside.
Factual Background
8. The Government of India launched the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (hereinafter ‘JNNSM’) with the objective to establish India as a global leader in solar energy. The Government of India through the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (hereinafter ‘MNRE’) designated NVVNL as a Nodal Agency for Phase-I of JNNSM.
9. NVVNL was required to purchase solar power from Solar Power Developers (SPDs); bundle it with the power available from coal based plants of NTPC; and sell the bundled power to various Distribution Utilities.
10. On 24.08.2011, NVVNL invited proposals for setting up of Grid Connected Solar PV Project under Phase-I Batch-II of JNNSM for purchase of power. NVVNL issued a Request for Selection (RfS) inviting bids for 350 MW of power. The bidders were to be selected in decreas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.