ASHA MENON
B. Ghose and Company Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Satish Mathur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHA MENON, J.
1. Since both the appeals have been filed against the same judgment and decree of the learned Trial Court dated 23rd February, 2015 passed in a suit filed by the respondent No. 1/Satish Mathur against the two appellants, namely, M/s. Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Ashok Leyland”) and M/s. B. Ghose and Company Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “B. Ghose”) who were defendants No. 1 and 2 respectively before the learned Trial Court, the same are being disposed of together by this common judgment.
2. The case set up by the respondent No. 1/plaintiff before the learned Trial Court for the recovery of Rs. 14,00,000/- was that he was the sole proprietor of M/s. Dayal Container Carriers. He had hired out trailers and trollies to B. Ghose, since June 1999, for which it was required to pay him hire charges. The trailer horses had been financed by Ashok Leyland through various Hire Purchase Agreements (“HPA” for short) on various dates. According to the respondent No. 1/plaintiff, he had been making payments regularly up to January 2002, but thereafter, as he left the employment of B. Ghose, the understanding was that B. Ghose would be makin
Bhanu Kumar Jain vs. Archana Kumar
Bhivchandra Shankar More vs. Balu Gangaram More
Bihar State Financial Corporation vs. Chhotanagpur Minerals
Devendra Kumar vs. State of Uttaranchal
General Radio and Appliances Co. Ltd. vs. M.A. Khader
Haryana Roadways vs. Jai Bhagwan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.