C. HARI SHANKAR
Bacardi And Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bahety Overseas Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The plaintiff is a well-known manufacturer of alcoholic beverages. It manufactures and sells rum-based beverages, mixed with various fruit essences, under the name “BREEZER”.
2. The defendants also manufacture fruit-based beverages, which are, however, non-alcoholic. The defendants manufacture and clear its beverages under the mark “FREEZ Mix”.
3. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants’ product infringes the plaintiff’s registered trademarks. The present suit, at the instance of the plaintiff, therefore, seeks an injunction against the defendants’ product.
4. The suit is presently pending before this court, awaiting completion of pleadings. The defendants have neither filed any written statement in response to the plaint nor any reply to IA 12323/2021, preferred by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), despite lapse of the time granted therefore. Both sides were permitted to file written submissions. I may note, however, that the written submissions of the defendants, which runs into 41 pages, is actually a para-wise written statement in response to the plaint. Be that as it may, I have heard learned Counsel for the p
Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta
Allied Blenders and Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt. Ltd.
Corn Products Refining Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd
Corn Products Refining Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd
F. Hoffman-La Roche & Co. Ltd v. Geoffrey Manner & Co. Pvt Ltd
Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. and Co.
Britannia Industries Ltd. v. ITC Ltd.
Luxembourg Brands S.A.R.L. v. G.M. Pens International Pvt. Ltd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.