J.R.Midha
Sunil Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
Govt of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT(ORAL)
J.R. Midha, J.
The requirements of justice give an occasion for the development of new dimension of justice by evolving juristic principles for doing complete justice according to the current needs of the Society. The quest for justice in the process of administration of justice occasions the evolution of new dimensions of the justice. J.S. Verma, J., in his Article "New Dimensions of Justice", (1997) 3 SCC J-3 observed that:
"....Justice is the ideal to be achieved by Law. Justice is the goal of law. Law is a set of general rules applied in the administration of justice. Justice is in a cause on application of law to a particular case. Jurisprudence is the philosophy of law. Jurisprudence and Law have ultimately to be tested on the anvil of administration of justice. 'Law as it is', may fall short of 'Law as it ought to be' for doing complete justice in a cause. The gap between the two may be described as the field covered by Morality. There is no doubt that the development of the law is influenced by morals. The infusion of morality for reshaping the law is influenced by the principles of Equity and Natural Justice, as effective agencies of growth. The ideal State is
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar
Devendra Singh Negi vs. State of U.P.
Inder Mohan Goswami vs. State of Uttaranchal
Lallan Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
M/s Jeevan Emu Care Indian P Limited vs. The State of Tamil Nadu
Raghuvansh Dewanchand Bhasin vs. State of Maharashtra
Rohit Kumar @ Raju vs. State of NCT Delhi
State of Maharashtra vs. Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar
Sumit Mehta vs. State NCT of Delhi
V.G.K. Senthilnathan vs. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu Police Headquarters
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.