JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner challenges the orders of 30 January 2004, 03 June 2004 and 04 April 2006. By the first order of 30 January 2004, the engagement of the petitioner as Director (HRD) in the Damodar Valley Corporation [3] on probation came to be terminated with immediate effect. By the order of 03 June 2004, the Bokaro Power Supply Company Private Limited [4] is stated to have offered the position of Head of Personnel and Administration to the petitioner. BPSCL is a joint venture entity formed by SAIL and the Corporation. Assailing the order of termination, the petitioner came to prefer W.P.(C) 20141/2005 before this Court. That petition was disposed of on 22 February 2006, with a direction to the Union - respondent to decide a representation that had been preferred by the petitioner aggrieved by his termination. Pursuant to the directions issued on that writ petition, the Union - respondent has proceeded to pass the order of 04 April 2006, noting that since the Corporation was an autonomous body which was governed by independent statutory regulations, no interference with the decision so taken was merited.

[3] Corporation

[4] BPSCL

2. The facts on which there is no major disput