CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Yogesh Jagia – Appellant
Versus
Jindl Biochem Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
1. The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking following prayer:-
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The Brief facts of the case leading to the filing of instant petition are as follows:
3. In 2005, four promoters of complainant company, namely, Rajinder Kumar Jindal, Attar Singh, Kartar Singh and A.P. Singh, jointly promoted “V4 Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.” (hereinafter “V4”). Prior to incorporation of V4, to avail opportunity to bid commercial plot of land at Karkardooma, all the four referred promoters contributed funds in complainant company and acquired a commercial plot of land at Karkardooma Community Center, Delhi from DDA, which was subsequently developed by V4 in terms of dev
Bhushan Kumar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr. (2012) 5 SCC 424
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar
Indian Oil Corpn. v. NEPC India Ltd. (2006) 6 SCC 736
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre
Medchl Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. v. Biological E. Ltd. (2000) 3 SCC 269 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 615
Nagawwa v. Veeranna Sivalingappa Konjalgi
Rajesh Bajaj v. State NCT of Delhi
Rupan Deol Bajaj v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill
State of Bihar v. Rajendra Agrawalla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.