SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Kushal Polysacks Private Limited Through Authorized Representative – Appellant
Versus
My Preferred Transformation Hospitality Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - Present petition has been filed under Sections 11(5) & (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
2. Pertinently, petitioner is an absolute owner of the land, comprising of ground floor plus four storied building constructed thereon, located at Mouza-Raigachi, J.L. No.12, P.S. Rajarhat, Kolkata-700135.
3. According to the petitioner, respondent approached the petitioner for allowing them to use the property mentioned above to run a hotel under the brand name of "OYO HOTELS" or "OYO TOWNHOUSE". A meeting was held between the parties wherein respondent proposed that the petitioner would be required to pay to respondent Rs.38,50,000/- on account of fittings fixtures, decorative items as per standard of OYO apart from payment of Rs.8,50,000/- towards design consultancy. Upon such payment, respondent would enter into a lease agreement and shall pay a sum of Rs.8,85,000/- per month once the business commences. It was agreed that parties would bear the cost of registration and a lock-in-period of 7 years.
4. Besides, petitioner also claims to have handed over all the relev
The court's decision emphasizes the importance of arbitration in resolving disputes and upholding the terms of the arbitration agreement.
Disputes arising from lease agreements are arbitrable, and consent for appointment of an arbitrator by the court can be given when one party fails to designate an arbitrator as per the lease agreemen....
Appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in cases of serious breach of lease terms.
The main legal point established is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 when the parties fail to mutually appoint one,....
The court's decision was influenced by the provisions of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the requirement for compliance with Section 12 before commencing the arbitrat....
Court emphasized that a party's failure to respond to notices regarding breach of contract leads to the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes, as stipulated by the Arbitration and Concilia....
Appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in cases where one part....
The court's decision was based on the specific provisions of the lease agreement and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing the importance of compliance with the arbitration process.
The court can appoint an Arbitrator when parties fail to mutually agree, as per agreement provisions and arbitration law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.