IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
M/s Tarun Enterprises Pvt. Ltd - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 1560 of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 4458 of 2021
Decided On : 29-11-2021
TRAN-1 - GST Transitional Credit - Rule 117, Rule 120A - The court discussed the technical glitches in filing the TRAN-1 form and referenced the judgments of 'Super India Paper Products Vs. Union of India' and 'SRC Aviation (P) Ltd. v. Union of India' to allow the petitioner to file the TRAN-1 form electronically or manually. The court also extended the date for accepting the form.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner faced technical glitches/errors while filing the TRAN-1 form and filed complaint applications. The court referred to previous judgments allowing taxpayers to file the form electronically or manually due to technical glitches.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the writ petition in accordance with previous judgments, extending the date for accepting the TRAN-1 form electronically or manually.
Issues: Technical glitches in filing the TRAN-1 form, petitioner's request to open the common portal or allow manual filing.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous judgments to allow the petitioner to file the TRAN-1 form electronically or manually due to technical glitches.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the date for accepting the TRAN-1 form electronically or manually was extended.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. - Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:
"i. To issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, to direct the Respondents to open the common portal for the Petitioner to be able to file TRAN-1 electronically; or alternatively to allow the Petitioner to avail the said ITC by manually filing TRAN-1 or by furnishing the details in Form GSTR 3B or in any other manner so as to enable the Petitioner to avail the transitional credit of Rs.71,25,873/-for GSTIN 07AAACT4460C2ZO, and transitional credit of Rs. 27,30,375/- for the GSTIN 09AAACU0057C1ZR, in its respective electronic credit ledgers.
ii. To pass an order declaring the impugned Rules 117 to 120A of the CGST Rules, 2017 (Annexure No. P/2 (Colly)) to be ultra vires the provisions of the CGST/ SGST Acts, 2017 and ultra vires the Constitution of India and to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to avail the credit which is legally due and belongs to the petitioner;
iii. To pass an order declaring the Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST dated 03.04.2018 (Annexure No. P /9) as illegal, unconstitutional and bad in law;
iv. Issue any other writ, order or direction in favour of the Petitioner, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the present facts and circumstances of the case, so as to ensure the ends of justice, or else the Petitioner shall suffer Irreparably;
v. to grant costs of this Petition; and
vi. to award such further and other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require.
Pass such other order(s) or further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, for which act of kindness the petitioner as is duty bound shall ever pray."
2. The petitioner faced technical glitches/errors while filing the TRAN-1, in respect of which he filed complaint applications dated 9th July, 2018 with the Nodal Officer and the Chief Commissioner. Likewise, another complaint dated 2nd August, 2018 was filed with the Nodal Officer, grievances cell of the GST department. These complaints were followed up with the representations dated 19th March, 2020 to the respondents.
3. Though, it is the case of the respondents that such a technical glitch/error cannot be considered as an error on the GST common portal, yet this Court in the case of "Super India Paper Products Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Finance, Secretary & Ors." WP(C) 1150/2020 decided on 27th May, 2021 has held as under:-
"12. The first batch of cases is where the Petitioners have placed the screenshots and/or communication to support their stance of having attempted to file the TRAN-1 Form prior to the deadline i.e., 27th December, 2017.
xxx xxx xxx
15. In all the aforesaid cases, all such Petitioners have genuinely attempted to file TRAN-1 Form within time and have also taken care to preserve some evidence which is now being relied upon in support of their contention. This proof of submission however has not been accepted by the Respondents. The stand of the Respondent is that in such matters there is no technical anomaly in filing of the TRAN1 Form on the GST portal. This Court in several decisions has given benefit to such taxpayers and even to those who did not have any evidence to support their filing of TRAN-1 Form within time. In SRC Aviation (P) Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors., 8 this Court, after recording the fact that Petitioner has placed a copy of the screenshot evidencing that it was unable to file the TRAN-1 Form on the GST Portal, allowed it to file the TRAN-1 Form electronically, or manually. The relevant portion of SRC Aviation (supra) reads as under:
"9. The factual position in the present case is not any different. At this juncture, it may be noted that as per Notification No. 49/2019: MANU/CGST/0051/2019 dated 09.10.2019 issued by CBIC, the date prescribed for filing of Form GST TRAN-1 under Rule 117 (1A) of the CGST Rules has been extended to 31.
AI
Taxpayers can file the TRAN-1 form electronically or manually if they face technical glitches, as established in previous judgments.
Taxpayers facing technical issues in filing form TRAN-1 are entitled to relief, recognizing tax credits as property rights protected under the Constitution, thus requiring fair treatment by revenue a....
The rights of the assessee in the credit standing in their favor cannot be deprived without authority of law, and relief can be granted based on technical glitches in filing forms.
Taxpayers should not be penalized for system failures in filing transitional credit claims, as credit is considered property that cannot be deprived without due process.
The period prescribed under Rule 117 of the Rules for filing the TRAN-1 Form was merely directory and not mandatory.
The court's decision emphasized the importance of accommodating delays caused by the Covid-19 pandemic in filing revised forms and verifying transitional credit claims.
The entitlement to Input Tax Credit cannot be denied on account of procedural problems and technical glitches.
Vested rights for transitioning unutilized CENVAT credits under the GST regime cannot be denied due to technical difficulties; taxpayers are entitled to rectify their filings.
The main legal point established is that technical difficulties on the common portal can entitle a taxpayer to the benefit of Rule 117(1A) of the CGST Rules, 2017, allowing for the processing of the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.