IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Sqn Ldr Cheshta Shankar - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 12314 of 2021
Decided On : 29-10-2021
Transfer - Armed Forces - The court held that transfer is an exigency of service, especially in the Armed Forces, and that the petitioner's transfer was justified due to her husband's posting to a non-family station. The court also emphasized that the facilities at the new posting location were not a valid reason to prevent the transfer.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged her transfer to AFA, Dundigal, Hyderabad, and sought a direction to continue her engagement at her last posting location due to family and facility-related reasons.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's transfer was justified as an exigency of service, especially in the Armed Forces, and that the facilities at the new posting location were not a valid reason to prevent the transfer. The court also directed the petitioner to file a pre-mature separation from service application by a specified date, leaving the rights and contentions of all parties open.
Issues: Challenge to transfer, request for continuation at last posting location, and application for pre-mature separation from service.
Ratio Decidendi: Transfer as an exigency of service, justification of transfer due to spouse's posting to a non-family station, and facilities at the new posting location not being a valid reason to prevent the transfer.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the petitioner to file a pre-mature separation from service application by a specified date, leaving the rights and contentions of all parties open.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. - C.M.No.38743/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.12314/2021 & C.M.No.38744/2021
1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Signal dated 08th October, 2021 whereby the Petitioner has been posted to AFA, Dundigal, Hyderabad w.e.f. 15th November, 2021. Petitioner also seeks a direction to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to continue her engagement at 29 Wg AF as her Last Leg posting.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner was posted to 29 Wg AF, Bamrauli w.e.f 25th March 2019 on co-location grounds as her husband was posted to 4 Arty Bde.
3. He states that the Petitioner was blessed with a daughter on 16th February 2021 and duly reported back at her 29 Wg at the end of her Maternity Leave on 29th June 2021. He states that the Petitioner has another daughter who is three years old.
4. He emphasises that the Petitioner’s husband has been posted to 630 SATA BTY, Hathigarh w.e.f 25th March, 2021 which is a non-family station and the Petitioner’s parents who are senior citizens have been suffering from multiple age-related ailments.
5. He points out that the Petitioner has been receiving certain assistance and facilities from her current station authorities in this regard because of which she has been able to render her services efficiently and dedicatedly. He also emphasises that AFA, Dundigal is a training base with huge quantum of flying operations situated in a remote location and is not well equipped with the facilities being availed by the Petitioner at her current place of posting.
6. He states that the Petitioner has preferred multiple applications i.e. in August, 2021 as well as on 13th October, 2021 requesting the Respondents for the screening of her Posting to AFA, but all her attempts have been in vain.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that transfer is an exigency of service, especially in the Armed Forces. Further, the Petitioner has completed two years of co-location posting and is being transferred because her husband has now been transferred to a non-family station.
8. This Court does not find any merit in the contention that the Petitioner should not be transferred, just because facilities at Bamrauli are better than the facilities provided at AFA, Dundigal. It is pertinent to mention that AFA, Dundigal is neither a non-family station nor a station without any facilities.
Consequently, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition.
9. At this stage, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner would like to file an application for pre-mature separation from service.
10. Accordingly, this Court directs that, in the event, the Petitioner files a pre-mature separation from service application by 01st November, 2021, the same shall be disposed of by the Respondents in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merit of the pre-mature separation from service application to be filed by the Petitioner. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition along with pending application stands disposed of.
In military service, transfer decisions are governed by service exigencies, which prioritize operational requirements over personal convenience.
Administrative decision-making regarding spouse posting must align with established welfare guidelines protecting family integrity and child upbringing. While specific postings are not an inherent ri....
Courts may not interfere with transfer as an exigency of service, but decisions denying discharge must be reasoned.
The High Court ruled that while service transfers are generally not interfered with, discharge applications must include adequate reasoning, necessitating reconsideration of the Petitioner’s request.
The court established that co-location postings for airmen should prioritize family welfare and that tenure restrictions must align with the policies governing such postings, particularly in cases in....
The needs and necessities of an individual in the Armed Forces are subservient to the needs of the Army, and postings are determined based on various factors, balancing the needs of the service with ....
Court orders consideration of petitioner's family hardships regarding employment postings.
Transfer and posting decisions in a disciplined force are made by the competent authority in the interest of the Force, and individual requests for specific locations may not be entertained.
The court established that the discretion of military authorities in transfer matters is broad, and judicial interference is limited unless there is a clear violation of law or evidence of mala fides....
The court recognized compassionate grounds in administrative decisions, allowing a personnel transfer extension due to medical necessity.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.