IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Mukul Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9305 of 2022
Decided On : 03-06-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's medical circumstances warrant transfer extension. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. notification rules on promotion and transfer. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. temporary extension granted on humanitarian grounds. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. special order issued; not a binding precedent. (Para 14 , 15) |
CM.APPL.27885/2022 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 9305/2022 & CM.APPL.27884/2022 (stay)
3. Vide the present writ petition, petitioner seeks quashing of order bearing No.FHQ, BSF Signal/Order No.R/3225 dated 22.04.2022 only to the extent upto which petitioner was transferred out from BSF Force, Headquarter, New Delhi; quashing of order bearing No.HQ SDG (WC), BSF Signal/Order No.R/1137/dated 04.05.2022 to the extent upto which the petitioner was posted in 78 Bn BSF; quashing of order bearing No.FHQ BSF Signal/Order No.R/3215 dated 14.05.2022 whereby petitioner's request/application for cancelling his transfer from FHQ, BSF, New Delhi was rejected by the competent authority; directions to respondents to post the petitioner to any BSF establishment in Delhi till the time the petitioner completes his Delhi tenure of three years on compassionate grounds and to post the petitioner in National Capital Region facilitating easy access to AIIMS, Delhi for his wife's treatment.
4. Notice issued.
5. Learned Senior Panel Counsel for respondents accepts notice.
6. Petitioner on his promotion from Assistant Commandant to the rank of Deputy Commandant was transferred out from Force Headquarter, Border Security Force to the Western Command vide Letter dated 22.04.2022.
7. Case of the petitioner is that his wife is suffering from PCOD since 2018. She was diagnosed with GUTB (Genito Urinary Tuberculosis) in December, 2021 and she has been taking treatment from AIIMS, Delhi as she is childless till date whereas the marriage of the petitioner was solemnised in 2016.
8. Learned counsel for respondents has drawn attention of this Court to Clause 9 of Notification dated 25.03.2000 issued by Ministry of Home Affairs which is as under:
"9. Posting on promotion.- A member of the Force upto and including the post of Second-in-Command while posted in a static formation, shall be posted to a duty Battalion on promotion to the next higher rank. The tenure rule shall not be applied in promotion cases:
Provided that the members of the Force who have less than 2 years of service before attaining the age of superannuation shall be exempted from application of this rule:
Provided further that the provisions contained in this rule shall only apply to the members of the Force who are promoted to a post which also exists in a Battalion."
9. Whereas, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the List of Promotion of the Assistant Commandants to Deputy Commandants dated 24.10.2018 wherein the respondents, while issuing the similar transfer order of promotion qua some of the promotees were kept at the same place in a static headquarters including Force Headquarters. Thus, as evident the aforesaid List of Promotion, the said Clause 9 of the aforesaid Notification has been relaxed in some of the cases by the respondents itself.
10. As submitted by learned counsel for petitioner, the petitioner's wife has been taking treatment since 2018 and when she got diagnosed with GUTB. She started taking treatment from AIIMS, Delhi. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner who is present in Court, submits that since he has no child, he wants to continue with the treatment at AIIMS, New Delhi and it will take maximum one year, therefore, his transfer orders may be extended for one year.
11. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions from petitioner, has undertaken that no further extension, on whatsoever ground, shall be sought by him for transfer order.
12. The said undertaking of learned counsel for petitioner is
The court recognized compassionate grounds in administrative decisions, allowing a personnel transfer extension due to medical necessity.
Point of law : Transfer of service – Member of Para Military Force – Wife on family wan conceived through IVF – Fresh representation to be made and competent authority to look under sympathetic consi....
The court upheld the routine nature of transfer orders in central paramilitary forces, asserting that personal circumstances do not constitute a grave reason for intervention.
Transfer as an exigency of service and lack of grave reason to interfere with transfer orders
Transfers in employment must consider humanitarian grounds, particularly regarding family health and educational stability.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering medical grounds for transfer and the need for fair monitoring of inter-zonal transfers as per the CRPF transfer polic....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.