PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Rajbala Ghiloria – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Sethi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral). - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 24th February 2021, passed by the Id. ADJ-03, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, by which the application filed by the Petitioner herein, under Order I Rule 10 CPC has been rejected by the Trial Court.
3. The brief background of the matter is that a suit for partition was filed in respect of the property bearing no. C-2/21, Malka Ganj, Delhi -17 {hereinafter, "suit property ") by the Plaintiff in the suit/ Respondent No. 1 herein. Respondent No. 2 herein is the Defendant in the suit. It is the admitted position between the Plaintiff and the Defendant that the Plaintiff owns l/3rd share of the suit property and the Defendant owns 2/3rd share in the same. However, the case of the Applicant/Petitioner herein is that the Defendant in the suit has sold his share of the property to the Petitioner. Accordingly, in view of the fact that the interest of the Petitioner could be affected in the said suit proceedings, the Petitioner filed an application under Order I Rule 10 CPC, for impleadment as a necessary party, which has
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.