SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 2111

MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Vikram Bhasin – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Y.P. Singh, Advocate, Ajesh Luthra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 11th May 2021 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in OA No.871/2021.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent was posted as Superintendent (Jewellery Appraiser) in the office of Commissioner of Customs at IGI Airport and was serving on the same post till his suspension. He states that on 03rd June, 2019, the respondent was placed under suspension in contemplation of the disciplinary proceedings. He states that his suspension was initially for a period of ninety days and thereafter, it was extended from time to time in the spells of one hundred and eighty days.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that in the impugned order the Tribunal has directed that the suspension of the applicant/respondent shall not be continued, once the present extension of time expires. He states that the Tribunal further directed that the applicant/respondent be reinstated in service soon thereafter.

5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Tribunal erred in holding th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top