RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
State Bank Of India – Appellant
Versus
Lucky Exports & Ors – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
Cm No.11464/2021 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.
2. The application is disposed of.
FAO (COMM) No.78/2021 & CM No.11463/2021 (for stay)
3. The appeal impugns the order dated 2nd March, 2020 of the Commercial Court, allowing the application of the respondent No. 1/plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) and injuncting encashment of bank guarantee.
4. The respondent No. 1/plaintiff had a contract from respondent No. 3 Syrian Corporation for Spinning and Weaving, an entity incorporated in and according to laws of Syria, whereunder the respondent No. 1/plaintiff was required to furnish a bank guarantee. The respondent No. 1/plaintiff requested its banker namely Syndicate Bank, since amalgamated with respondent No. 2 Canara Bank, to issue the said guarantee and the Syndicate/Canara Bank in turn requested the appellant to issue the bank guarantee. The appellant accordingly issued the bank guarantee in favour of the respondent No. 4 Commercial Bank of Syria, being the banker of the respondent No. 3, with which the respondent No. 1/plaintiff had contracted.
5. The responden
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.