SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1992

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Ashok Singhal - Appellant
Versus
State NCT Of Delhi & Ors. - Respondents
Test Cas No. 41 of 2019; Interlocutory Application No. 9232 of 2020
Decided On : 25-01-2021

Advocates appeared:
Vikram Pradeep, Advocate, Nirmal Goenka, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of Letters of Administration in accordance with the Indian Succession Act, 1925, based on the uncontested nature of the case and the acceptance of the Will as the last testament.

Headnote:

Letters of Administration - Estate Administration - Will dated 12th May, 1991 - [Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 276] - The court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner to administer the estate of the deceased testator in terms of the Will dated 12th May, 1991.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought grant of Letters of Administration to administer the estate of late Dr. N.C. Singhal, his father, based on a Will dated 12th May, 1991. The Will bequeathed certain properties to the petitioner, and the petitioner sought the court's approval to administer the estate in accordance with the Will.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Will dated 12th May, 1991, was executed by the Testator and was the last Will and testament. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 did not oppose the grant of Letters of Administration, and Respondent No. 4 was set ex-parte. The court accepted the valuation reports of the property and granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner to administer the estate in terms of the Will.

Issues: The main issue was the grant of Letters of Administration to the petitioner in order to administer the estate of the deceased testator in accordance with the Will dated 12th May, 1991.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the uncontested nature of the case, the acceptance of the Will as the last testament, and the lack of opposition from Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. The court also considered the valuation reports of the property and granted the Letters of Administration to the petitioner.

Final Decision: Letters of Administration were granted to the petitioner to administer the estate of the deceased testator in terms of the Will dated 12th May, 1991.

JUDGMENT

C Hari Shankar, J. - By this petition, the petitioner seeks grant of Letters of Administration, in order to enable the petitioner to administer the estate of late Dr. N.C. Singhal, his father, consequent to a Will, dated 12th May, 1991, executed by Dr. Singhal (hereinafter referred to as "the Testator"), who expired on 20th November, 2004.

2. Mrs. Premwati Singhal, the mother of the petitioner and wife of the Testator, expired on 27th October, 2017. The Testator is stated to be survived by the petitioner, his two brothers Mr. Prakash Chand Singhal and Mr. Tara Chand Singhal, who are impleaded as Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein and his sister Veena Gupta, who is impleaded as Respondent No. 4.

3. It is stated that, initially, an unexecuted Will dated 4th October 2004 was discovered by the petitioner and respondents, consequent to the death of the testator, and that they had informally agreed to abide by the covenants thereof. Later, however, the petitioner and Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 came in possession of an executed Will dated 12th May, 1991, of the Testator, in respect whereof, the present petition has been filed.

4. The Will was executed in the presence of Mr. Satish Chand Aggarwal and Mr. R.P. Agrawal, witnesses, who had also appended their signatures thereto. This, it is stated, was the last Will and testament of the Testator.

5. Respondent No. 4 is stated to have demurred, qua devolution of one particular property of the Testator, being C-115, Greater KailashI, New Delhi-110048. It is asserted that this property was the self acquired property of the Testator, purchased under a registered sale deed dated 6th September, 1997.

6. The original of the Will dated 12th May, 1991, as well as the registered Sale Deed dated 6th September, 1997, have been placed on record.

7. It is further asserted that the Testator was in sound health and of sound disposing mind at the time of execution of the Will dated 12th May, 1991. Under the said Will, the property at C-115, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi-110048, inter alia, was bequeathed to the petitioner. The status of the various properties has been provided, in a tabular form, in para 9 of the petition, which may be reproduced thus:

    "Sr.No.

    Description of Assets/Property

    Status

    1.

    Agricultural Land/Plot at Pirthala, Tehsil Palwal

    Yet to be administered

    2.

    C-115, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi-110048

    Yet to be administered

    3.

    Plot in Green Field Colony situated in District-Faridabad

    Disposed of by Testator during his lifetime

    4.

    9 FDRs for Rs 5000/- each for each Grandchild

     

    5.

    Cash Deposits& Investments

    Disposed of between the Legal Heirs in accordance with the unsigned/unexecuted"

    8. The petition has been verified by the executors of the Will and their affidavits have been attached to the petition.

    9. As a beneficiary to the aforesaid Will, the petitioner seeks Letters of Administration, to administer the estate of the Testator in terms thereof.

    10. The petition prays thus:

      "In view of the above narrated facts and circumstances, the Petitioner most humbly pray to this Hon'ble Court:

        a) To grant Letters of Administration of Will dated 12.05.1991 with respect to the estate of Late Dr. N.C Singhal in favour of the Petitioner enabling the Petitioner to administer the estate of the Testator. and/or.

          b) Pass any such other reliefs as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case to meet the ends of justice."

          11. Notice was issued, in the present petition, on 29th May, 2019 and citations were directed to be published. Valuation reports were also called for from the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrates (SDMs).

          12. On 21st November, 2019, it was observed, by the court, that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 did not oppose the petition. As there was a discrepancy with respect to one of the properties of the Testator,

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top